I am trying to download the Canadian Forces Personnel Appraisal System ( CFPAS) from. I copied the ‘word for word’ info into this thread from the CFPAS Handbook and Policy Directive. You sound like you are somewhat familiar with. 25 Department of National Defence, CFPAS CFPAS Handbook (Ottawa: DND Canada, ), But as they are described in the CFPAS Handbook, they.

Author: Ner Gujin
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 1 January 2017
Pages: 398
PDF File Size: 9.82 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.71 Mb
ISBN: 189-9-20226-583-3
Downloads: 22707
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mezigal

Great leadership is characterized by strong, open handboom honest relationships between leaders and subordinates. Her administrative job knowledge and dedication to her sub-unit were exemplary. His research suggests that leaders with cfpsa EI are unable to control their own emotional response, thereby negating their ability to offer critical negative feedback. To better understand this cultural problem and how to fix it, this study will divide the cultural discussion into two areas: My Service Canada Account.

While the AAR has allowed honest feedback delivery to work at the macro -level, a refreshed approach is needed at the individual level. Report a problem or mistake on this page.

The Committee found that the grievor’s PER should be based on the current reporting period and previous assessments were not relevant. While the organizational culture surrounding handbiok negative feedback is in need of change, there are some notable flaws within the CAF evaluation process that ultimately discourage the delivery of honest feedback.

Validating these observations, and revealing a general lack of confidence in the CFPAS, the same survey of CAF members revealed that over half the respondents believed that PDRs and PERs are rarely or never used effectively, while only 3 percent believed that they are always used effectively.

Although all yearly CFPAS guidance emanates from a central source with a view to ensure standardization across the CAF, there are areas of interpretation which manifest themselves as each successive environment, formation, and unit adds their own specific guidance.

Instead of viewing the feedback as an earnest attempt to encourage professional development, many individuals decide to react in an entirely unhelpful manner, adopting a defensive attitude to fend off the seemingly personal attack.


The grievor’s supervisor also confirmed that the draft PER was an accurate reflection of his perception of the grievor’s performance and potential. Finally, having observed that the grievor provided no new evidence to justify any score increases, the Committee carefully reviewed the grievor’s original contested PER ratings and found that they were consistent with the PER narratives and the CFPAS Word Pictures and did not merit being increased.

At the other end lies critical negative feedback—feedback which reveals performance deficiencies and areas for improvement, which many find difficult to provide and accept.

A culture has been created within the CAF where constructive feedback often equates to bullying, where compassion for our members equates to protecting their feelings, and where employee happiness supersedes meaningful professional development. Failure to deliver critical negative feedback can lead to the wrong people being put into the wrong positions at the wrong time, thereby promoting the cycle of personnel mismanagement. How can change be elicited within the CAF leadership?

Translation of “CFPAS Handbook” in French

More importantly, the Committee found that the imposition of score controls by the branch was not permitted by the policy. Lying to subordinates for fear of being labelled as an unkind or uncaring leader will not lead to changed behavior and will not foster trust between leaders and subordinates.

But are the existing CAF processes optimized for this cultural shift to honest feedback delivery? A recent survey of CAF members revealed that nearly half the respondents experience some cfpax of discomfort when receiving critical negative feedback.

Fcpas, there are strategies to enable the healthy acceptance of critical negative feedback.

# 2013-104 – Personnel Evaluation Report (PER)

As can be seen, both the leader and subordinate have roles to play in normalizing the practice of delivering critical negative feedback. This ultimately results in leaders conducting the appraisal in a cursory fashion without discussing areas of a good performance, or areas where performance can be improved.

Constant role changes and promotions demand that CAF members learn new skills and progressively accept increased amounts of responsibility. Additionally, self-aware people, capable of recognizing and regulating their emotions, are better equipped for stifling their own negative emotional impulses as required.

Make hzndbook you provide the tools that help the agent improve his or her performance. Information is outdated or wrong.

  IEC 61960 1 PDF

CFPAS Handbook – Translation into French – examples English | Reverso Context

The same cgpas of CAF members revealed that only 28 percent of respondents felt that their training received thus far has fully enabled them to receive constructive negative feedback. Please handbkok all that apply: I can’t find what I’m looking for. Believing there was no other solution to solve the crisis of a weeping subordinate seated in his office, Major Renault informed Master Corporal Sampson that the voice inflection was really no big deal and that she should disregard the observation entirely.

The Committee then found that the grievor’s PER scoring could not be benchmarked to previous PER scoring as that would contravene policy and be contrary to the intent of annual performance appraisals.

Furthermore, many individuals view critical handboo, feedback as a personal attack and refuse to accept it as a necessary step in self-improvement. Major Robb has also completed two operational tours in Kandahar, Afghanistan. CAF leaders cannot simultaneously espouse mental toughness on the battlefield and show mental weakness with respect to personnel evaluation methods.

Based upon several case studies, they assert that tough empathy is one of the single-greatest ways for cflas to show that they care and can be trusted.

They will not only communicate with authenticity, which is the precondition for leadership, but they will also show that they are doing more than just playing a role. Offering critical negative feedback involves one-on-one dialogue, which is extremely uncomfortable for many leaders. If constituents do not trust the messenger, then they certainly will not trust the message, which, in this case, is the critical negative feedback.

If an individual is not overtly made aware of an ongoing deficiency, then he or she may reasonably assume that the behavior is indeed tolerated, which could lead to the undesired behavior being imitated by others.